Wednesday, March 4, 2009

A High Schooler Was Asked, "If There Was A Plague in LA, Where Would You Go?"


My dear cousin was enlisted in writing a daily blog for her high school English Class. Unfortunately, it was an English Honors class, further showing the degredation of our nation's Public School System. I'd hate to know how mediocre the regular class is.

Here is the prompt: If You Heard There Was a Plague in LA, Where Would You Go?

THE RESPONSE:

"Ummm, since I am totally terrified of death, I would have to think of a really good place to go, really far from LA and from the epidemic plague thing and the undocumented immigrants who probably brought the disease through one of the Los Angeles area ports and spread it through the sewer system and the burritos. It couldn't be Victorville either because there's a bunch of freakin' hillbillies there.

So, ummm, I would gather all of my things, especially my brand new Gucci shoes, my phone, my dog Leonardo Christopher Shannanay Nicoli Jimenez Ricardo, and my boyfriend, cause he's a keeper - well, after he looses a couple pounds and learns how to not ejaculate prematurely.

But anyways, I would take my prized possessions, and buy my own island, if I didn't already have one at the time, because that is something I have always wanted to purchase. Haha. Like the ones off the coast of Dubai that are shaped like the world, yeah that is where I would go if a plague came to LA.

I think it would be pretty cool. Just me, my man bitch, and my most important baby Leo. If for some reason food became scarce, my dog Leo and I would eat him first, because he is a disposable commodity after I become pregnant and repopulate the island. It would be called [my cousin's name] island because I am a princess, and since the island would be off the coast of Dubai, when my boyfriend pisses me off I would send his ass away to get more shoes or makeup or whatever other necessities I need to be replenished.

Although come to think of it, I would like to go to a wet mountainous region. I would want it to be sort of like the jungle, kind of like the jungle book except Mowgli or that tarzan guy would be over eighteen and look fine fine fine and not like that one prepubescent twerp in the animated movie. It would have lush surroundings with very green vegetation. It would be a fertile land and have plenty of water in the form of streams, waterfalls, pond thingies and the water would be filtered so I could drink it and bathe in it. Although if Evian Corp. wanted to send me a gazillion cubic foot tank that might also work too, as long as the water is not bottled anywhere near Los Angeles or Latin America, cause this one time in Venezuela I got really really sick from whatever bacteria they have in the water and the locals are unfortunately accustomed to.

However, in that mountainous region, like my island, there would be a beach nearby just in case I wanna tan, and so I could have fresh sushi but close enough where it didn't bother me. So my fantasy place would be like the island of The Incredibles. I would want it to be very very simple...but technologically advanced and top of the line. Something like a device to cool the sand so I could walk on it in a hot day would be nice, while the island still looked lush and primitive like the beaches on the Mexican West Coast or Nicaragua.

The most important thing would be little treehouse cabana type things, covered with white linens, and equipped with champagne and cabana boys who feed me frozen grapes. It would be just me and my lover on the island with our male servants so I don't have to worry about him cheating. If he cheats on me with one of the cabana boys, or at worst, my dog, he will totally be executed.

And I would have perfect boobs and all the relaxed linen Tommy Bahama clothes, shoes, and accessories I could ever want!

Man, that would be the life. I would do this regardless of the plague."

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Delta's Broad Network Changes During Its First Summer Married to Northwest



I believe this to be a comprehensive list of Delta's new routes and capacity/aircraft changes for this summer. Some major network notes include:

  • This is Delta's first summer in the LAX intercontinental market in over 7 years featuring 3 different international aircraft types and 3 different BusinessElite products flying out of LAX. 1 777LR with lie-flat BusinessElite suites to Sydney, 1 763ER with a standard BusinessElite cabin to Sao Paulo, and 1 B744 from Northwest operating WorldBusinessClass to Tokyo-Narita.
  • The 777 returns to Europe with introduction on New York-Madrid (July 2), and returns on New York -Tokyo starting June 4th. New York-Barcelona will also get a B764 upgrade, as does New York-Tel Aviv on a 777 until July 1st.
  • A 767-400ER Version D will be operating all London-Heathrow routes to Detroit, Atlanta, and New York (JFK 2x daily), as well as New York-Moscow and New York-Sao Paulo. This version has a new kind of BusinessElite suite called "Thompson Vantage Suites" that are perfectly suited to give Business passengers immediate aisle access on B767 aircraft. Minneapolis-London/LHR will continue to be operated with standard WorldBusinessClass A332.
  • Delta will be moving NWA's 744 on signature Delta routes like Atlanta-Tokyo (May 1) and Atlanta-Honolulu (April 2), as well as NWA's A333 on Atlanta-Amsterdam and New York-Rome. In turn, Delta's B763 will be operating on NWA's routes from Portland to Amsterdam and Tokyo, as well as Minneapolis to Paris-CDG. Delta's B757 (EX-TWA) will be operating Seattle-Kahului/Maui.
  • This summer will see major beyond Tokyo capacity reductions with placement of more 757's on intra-Asia routes like Tokyo-Bangkok, Tokyo-Seoul, Tokyo-Ho Chi Minh City, and Tokyo-Taipei. However, Tokyo does get its first ever service to Salt Lake City on Delta (A332) as well as resumption of service to New York (B777).
  • Delta is scheduled to operate 7 routes to Paris in cooperation with its Air France joint-venture, most notably to Pittsburgh (757), Raleigh/Durham (Jun 2010/757), Philadelphia (Oct 05/757), Salt Lake City (763), and Minneapolis (763). This compliments existing service to Atlanta and Cincinnati (both 763).
  • Atlanta-Johannesburg will join Delta's Atlanta-Mumbai as one of the world's longest nonstop routes by mileage, both over 8400 miles, respectively. It will be flown with Delta's flagship 777LR (long range).
  • In Africa, new Atlanta-Cape Town and Atlanta-Nairobi service with a stop in Dakar, Senegal. Also, Dakar (DKR) becomes a logistical connecting point for Delta service to the African cities of Malabo, Luanda, Abuja, and Monrovia. The plane that connects in Dakar to these cities will originate in New York and maintain connection possibilities both ways to the Atlanta flight. Not to be left out, Delta will be resuming the planned New York to Lagos, Nigeria service and upgrading New York-Accra, Ghana to a 764.
  • The Northeast Brazil operations will hopefully be finalized this summer. As per what we see now, Brasilia, Fortaleza, and Manaus will be seeing either 3x-4x weekly to Atlanta on B757 aircraft.

Without further adieu, Delta's new summer routes and capacity/aircraft changes:

7x B77L LAX-SYD

7x B744 LAX-NRT

3x B763 LAX-GRU

7x A333 SEA-NRT

7x B763 PDX-NRT

7x A332 HNL-NRT

7x A744 HNL-NRT

7x B744 HNL-KIX

7x B744 HNL-ATL

7x A333 SEA-AMS

7x B763 PDX-AMS

7x B763 EWR-AMS

7x B777 JFK-NRT

7x B777 JFK-MAD

7x B777 JFK-TLV

7x B764 JFK-LHR (#1 early evening/VERSION D LF BE)

7x B764 JFK-LHR (#3 late evening/VERSION D LF BE)

7x B764 JFK-SVO (VERSION D LF BE)

7x B764 JFK-GRU (VERSION D LF BE)

7x B764 JFK-BCN

6x B764 JFK-ACC

7x B767 JFK-ATH

7x B767 JFK-VCE

4x B767 JFK-FCO

7x A333 JFK-FCO

5x B763 JFK-LOS

3x B763 JFK-PRG

4x B763 JFK-OTP

4x B757 JFK-VLC

4x B757 ATL-BSB

3x B757 ATL-FOR

3x B757 ATL-MAO

7x B757 JFK-ZRH

5x B757 PIT-CDG

7x A333 ATL-LGW

7x A333 ATL-AMS

7x A333 ATL-FCO

3x B763 ATL-CPT (via Dakar)

4x B763 ATL-NBO (via Dakar)

7x B763 AMS-BOM

7x B757 AMS-BDL

7x B764 ATL-LHR (LF BE)

7x B764 DTW-LHR

4x B744 DTW-PVG

4x B77L ATL-PVG

7x B77L ATL-JNB

7x B763 MSP-CDG

7x A333 NRT-HKG

7x A332 NRT-PVG

7x B763 NRT-GUM

7x B757 NRT-BKK

7x B757 NRT-SGN

7x B757 NRT-ICN

7x B757 NRT-TPE

7x B757 NRT-KIX

5x A332 NRT-SLC

7x B767 CVG-LGW

7x B757 CVG-AMS

7x B757 JFK-DKR (connecting to Malabo, Luanda, Abuja, and Monrovia)

Saturday, February 7, 2009

35 Very Random Things About Me: Cause I Already Did It On Facebook


If Keith Olbermann knew me, he would no doubt label me the "worst person in the world". Unfortunately for Keith, he actually is the worst person in the world.
_______________
Mickey Dee's Please
1. One of the most important things in my life is food and drink. I'm extremely anal about going out to eat once a day and having at least two free refills. I refuse to frequent restaurants without free refills...except Gypsy's - for your delicious calzones I'll make an exception.
________________
Aunt Pay Is Famous
2. My Aunt Pay is famous via being written about in Shirley MacLaine's "The Camino: A Journey of the Spirit", which takes place in Spain. In the book she touches upon my Aunt Pay's lifelong affair with a wealthy Spanish banker named Carlos who ridicules her for her large makeup cases, diva-ish behavior, and taking buses during what was supposed to be a spiritual camino.


_____________________
Delta is My Drug of Choice

3. For the first 23 years of my life I traveled free on PanAm/Delta. It was a boatload of fun, and so far, I've been to all six inhabited continents and 30 countries (if I shamelessly include Vatican City). I've been to several countries twice - and Spain, France, Argentina, and Japan three times or more. My first trip was to New York to visit Aunt Pay when I was two and internationally to Nice when I was five or so. My last new country was actually the global crown jewel I'd for some odd reason waited years for - London. Up next on my to do list are: Peru, South Africa, Thailand, India, and maybe some Northern Australia (with a stop in Melbourne of course to visit Berkeley's favorite Australian).
___________________
All Alone in Salt Lake City

4. When I was younger, I got in a fight with my dad in Minneapolis and he promised he'd leave me behind if I got bumped on our 1 stop flight to Los Angeles via Salt Lake City (he went as a paid passenger). So during the stop some gentlemen showed up with a boarding card for my seat. I had a huge panic attack and the flight attendant escorted me in tears to the gate agent to figure out what was going on. It turns out they had upgraded me to First Class. Nevertheless, I didn't go on a plane for a year and a half after that.
_________________
Flirting at McDonald's
5. I'm not above groveling for a very large cone at McDonalds. I will flirt, lean on the counter, and bat my eyes to get a very large cone or a very full sundae. I don't care who I have to do it with either - girls or boys, fat or skinny. But my day will be ruined if I don't get an adequate cone or sundae.
_____________
The Hour Shower

6. I take obscenely long showers, so long that both my parents request that I take them at the other's house to avoid a doubling of their water bill. My Scottish-Jew father (who is not really either of those elements) even made vicious attempts to install a water-saving showerhead filled with little pebbles to prohibit adequate water flow.



___________
Ewww, Gross

7. I wear my emotions on my face through wild expressions. When something tastes shitty I can't hide it. When I find something morbidly distasteful I can't hide it. When I'm pissed I can't hide it. When I'm sad I can't hide it. When I'm happy to see someone I can't hide it (and no, get your mind out of the gutter). By the way, thanks for the lovely picture Anna.
________________________
May I Have a Diet Coke with...

8. My drink of choice is 85% diet coke mixed with 15% regular coke, with the cup about 70% filled with ice. A little rum if I'm feeling frisky. If any of this is not followed my day will be ruined.
________
Ice Habits

9. I consume extreme amounts of ice per day and per session. Some people regard this as nothing short of a miracle, as it would send a normal person to the hospital with a severe case of brain freeze. It's apparently a genetic thing on my dad's side, as my dad, granddad, sister, aunts, and cousins all chew ice. People have accused me of chewing ice because I'm sexually frustrated - so firstly, I'm not sexually frustrated, and secondly, I must have been a pretty sexually frustrated four year old.
_______________________
Prude by Day, Bitch by Night

10. I have different attitudes and feelings at different times of the day. Early in the day I feel more realistic, down-to-earth, and linearly productive; and later in the day I feel more saucy, naughty, provocative, innovative, and just all around better.
____________________________________
"Excuse Me? Seriously. What's happening?"

11. My life is made steady by predictable things. Just small things that I love so much. Like calling Rachael on the phone and hearing a loud "merf"! Or John complaining about being hungry. Or Carlos going "excuse me" or "seriously" or "what's happening". Or Chola's loud screams. There are a million more that I've learned not to share so they're kept special for myself, but these are some obvious ones.
____________________
Mary Rose Is a Smart Ass

12. My sister Mary Rose, who unfortunately has turned 14, is getting fresh and being a teenagerish/smart ass. I don't like it at all.
_______________

That's An Outrage

13. I'm sanitized to everything, so I get a kick out of inflammatory things that anger certain groups. Especially groups filled with self-righteous white people who need to stop worrying about other people's business. When NOW or the NAACP or anything else with an acronym is outraged, it's pretty sweet.



__________________________________________________
"I'm a Jokester"

14. Please see the photo above.
__________________________
Give Me a Big Mac and I'm Good
15. Some people think I'm a spoiled snob, but the truth of the matter is that I can live very simply and easily. I don't need things and I don't find much pleasure in buying just for the sake of buying. Although take me to Brookstone or Staples and I can do some damage there.
_____________________
Center-Right to Hard-Right

16. I grew up with my mom on the hard right and my dad on the libertarian free market hard-right. I've chosen to adopt my dad's "economic libertarian free market" principles and acquired my own ideas on social centrism. My dad also went to Berkeley and like me resisted the vulgar dominating hard-left elements of the 1960's.
____________________________
Win A Date With Johnnie Cochran

17. My mom has met so many celebrities over the years it would make TMZ jealous. I've pretty much only seen celebrities on the plane and stuff, but one of my greatest celebrity accomplishments was meeting Johnnie Cochran on a flight from New York to LA on Delta (way back in the day), and amusing him with my pitch to sue the Coca-Cola corporation for making kids fat.
___________________________
"My Parents Are Larger Than Life"

18. My dad worked on the Apollo project, has a patent, was an amateur race car driver, and has been nearly killed about seven times. My mom has been to over one hundred countries and has met countless celebrities, diplomats, presidents, and her personal favorite, Jackie Kennedy.
_________
Yeah, Sure

19. I'm super happy-go-lucky. I find joy in a lot of stuff.
______________________________________
"Matt Drudge"

20. I'm obsessed with the Drudge Report. I think I bought my i-Phone just so I could check Drudge every fifteen minutes.
_____________
Jay From Korea

21. At Carden (my elementary school) we had a Korean foreign exchange student named Jay to whom we taught a grand series of profanities, most notably "boobs", which he pronounced "boofs".
___________________
Militant Facebook User

22. The very first facebook groups I joined were "Americans Embarrassed by Americans Embarrassed by America", "Berkeley College Republicans", and "Racist, Sexist, and Generally Insensitive".
_________________________
"But It's The Scientific Name!"

23. My Aunt Pay insists on calling black people "negroes" (because she never left the 60's) and my mom insists on calling black waitresses "Barack Obama" (because she finds it funny). My Dad insists on using scientific terms, no matter how politically outdated they are, because he is a scientist. In trying to figure out why I have a big rebel streak, I look to the fact that in high school my mom decided to start the "El Club Comunista Sovietica" and lock nuns out of the classroom and jump out of the window.
_________________________________________
Mrs. Krueger's Singular Tastes For Classical Music

24. One of my favorite memories from high school was when my Chemistry teacher Mrs. Krueger sent a girl named Avideh out of the room in order to concoct a plan involving taping her without her knowing at cheer practice along to the track "Tiny Dancer" (and Mrs. Krueger's own rendition of Tiny Dancer with hand as fake microphone followed). While we're on the subject, going back to #11, Mrs. Krueger use to always play this one classical track during labs. It got very repetitive, but I loved it. I will never forget the track nor Mrs. Krueger's Chemistry labs as long as I live.
___________________
Why This Note is Here

25. In Senior English, my English teacher Mrs. Hein encouraged us to develop our writing in different and creative ways. If not for that I don't know if I would have enjoyed playing around with the craft as much, or at all. And I passed the AP Exam to boot, so double whammy! Thanks Mrs. Hein.
______________
I'm Goin' To Hell

26. I have a few things I need to go to confession for. Life ain't easy.
_________________________________
Sexy On the Outside, Nerd on the Inside

27. Okay, maybe "sexy" took it a little to far. Okay, a lot too far. But the point is that I'm a huge nerd on the inside, without looking like a dweeb on the outside. And I think that's the perfect way to be, because if I remember anything Mrs. Krueger ever said, it's that "nerds always make the best husbands". And I'm feeling a lot more confident than I did a few years ago, which is good going into this tough stage of my life when everything isn't as laid out and simple as I'd like it to be. I'm still tripping over myself on occasion, and the "double foot clap" incident does not count, thank you very much.
____________
Baby Blue Eyes

28. Apparently my blue eyes were a severe anomaly, as it would require that someone on my mom's side of the family have blue eyes, which is not the case as far as I know. My grandfather and perhaps great grandparents reportedly had "green eyes", but apparently green does not equal blue.
__________________
Those People Are Old!

29. My mom had me when she was 44 years old. And my dad has frankly stated that if her amniocentesis showed I had any birth defects or syndromes (common for that age), they were going to abort me. Anyway, on the old topic, my oldest aunt is 73 and my youngest aunt (half aunt via my grandfather) is 27. My oldest cousin is 48 and my youngest is 21 (plus a bunch of half-cousin toddlers running around).

_____________________
Dimmer Switches Please!

30. I've extremely oversensitive to light. Intense or even semi-intense light to normal light just beats at my brain and I can't stand it. My last year roommates, who were my first ever, can probably attest to my anal preference for turning lights off and using my dimly watted desk light, mostly in an ensconced fashion. People are always weirded out finding me in the dark.
______________________
New Friends I Have This Year
31. I was very lucky I decided to do the dorms last year because I met some really great people who I'm still pretty close to now, and we all know I don't make friends too easily. Anyway, as a result of those friends I've made a few other new friends, most specifically Babs and Alex, who I've both grown to appreciate immensely. The interesting part is that without these connector friends we would have never become friends in the first place because we all kind of roll in different things. Babs and I have this strange chemistry and we get along really well, and Alex is funny, quirky, inflammatory, and really chill - we're pretty different but I like him a lot. There are a couple friends I wish I had been more in touch with this year, but hopefully time and circumstance will change that.
______________
Favorite Clothes

32. I love to wear "Staff Shirt" (a simple deep blue Cal Polo that I feel at home in), "Metrosexoulis" (my edgy metrosexual t-shirt), "Santiago Chile Jeans" (these great jeans that I bought in Santiago that are significant because they are a size 31 equivalent in US men's jeans, which satisfies my anorexic tendencies), "Ennis" (a kind of wool/denim rancher jacket much akin to the one worn by Ennis Del Mar in Brokeback Mountain), "Australia Sweater" (this great zip up sweater that I bought in Sydney and fell in love with), "Bulge Shorts" (no comment, but thanks Josh), and "Cal Beanie" (my warm beanie that covers my ears and makes me feel cozy and protected, even on a warm day). In fact, as I write here on this cold rainy day, I'm predictably wearing Staff Shirt, Ennis, Cal Beanie, and Santiago Chile Jeans. In general however, I generally like dark blue colors, not cause I like the hippies at Cal or the Democratic Party or anything. It's just kinda deep yet low key, like me.



___________
Metrosexuality

33. If I pieced together different elements of my five most masculine guy friends, I would no doubt be able to craft an extremely metrosexual guy. The point being that I don't feel bad about being metrosexual in some ways, whether it be tight edgy clothes or specific grooming habits/manscaping, and I don't feel like less of a guy because of it. Let's not pretend that chicks don't like a little maintenance. And my metrosexuality often occurs on a non-constant basis, where some days I'll wear a non-tight sweater and sweatpants with no metrosexual grooming - or grooming whatsoever, period. I'd say some of my most masculine friends privately admit to some specific grooming habits or vain metrosexual obsessions - it's just not to be said out loud. But everyone knows it goes on.
_______
Eyebrows

34. Contrary to popular opinion, I do not alter my eyebrows in any shape, fashion, or form. I know I sound even more guilty after that metrosexual spiel, but I swear my eyebrows are naturally exquisite. Seriously.
______
Tragedy

35. In early 1985, my 76 year old grandfather and his 4 year old daughter Suyapa were boarding a bus bound for the airport to deliver Suyapa to my parents in the United States, free from her abusive and drug-addicted 22 year old mother and full of a sense of opportunity. Likely as a result of his concern that my mom would not accept Suyapa, he keeled over, had a heart attack, and died square in front of 4 year old Suyapa as they were boarding the bus. Needless to say, she has not made it to America. She is one of my grandfather's nine children, ranging from 73 to 27 amongst five different wives.
____________
A Lasting Effect

I don't think that a lot of people - whether they be relatives, good friends, or hour long acquaintances - realize the incredible impact they have upon my life in very large and positive ways. Isn't that really the focal point of our lives as social beings? When somebody is down, I wish I could tell them that they've made one life better and outline all the ways they've made mine brighter without realizing it.
God bless.





Monday, November 3, 2008

2008 Endorsement: John McCain



by Justin La Grange

I'm writing to you not as a Republican. I'm writing to you not with any racial mindset. I'm writing to you not with riches or richly in-debt. I'm writing to you as an American; from Warren Buffett to Joe the Plumber to Betsy the Smoking Homeless; from Harvard's Joseph Ocklesworth IV to Holland's Joe the Plumber to Huntington Beach's Jose Rodriguez; from J. Lo repping the Bronx to Mary-Jo repping the South to Scar-Jo repping SoCal. I'm writing to you as an American who wants to see the best of present and future. As an American, who wants to preserve the tradition and sanctity of the presidential office. As an American, who values a leader with only the top notch representation of American values and character. As an American, I can think only of John McCain as an option to represent this country going forward.

First and foremost, I would like to start out by paying tribute to and saluting Barack Obama. After witnessing the vicious, slanderous, unfounded, and hurtful attacks hurled at Governor Sarah Palin, I decided to take the upper ground in terms of fair political discourse. Senator Obama should be applauded for potentially becoming the nation's first black president. He's a man of unparalleled brilliance, style, and inspirational qualities. I don't want to take away from the magnitude of that achievement, and I think he has the character and durability to be a good leader.

However, I do have some significant reservations.

Senator Obama rose to fame and power after appearing at the 2004 Democratic Presidental Convention, during which time he gave a rousing speech that catapulted him to the United States Senate after serving for a few years in the Illinois State Senate. During his four years in the Senate, he focused two of those on his run for the Presidency.

The biggest question in all of this is why? Why now? There's a certain level of audacity to saying that you're going to run for President after such a short stint in major public office, notably one without any executive experience. Isn't there a certain level of effrontery to want to be President without waiting your turn and gaining more experience? Isn't there a certain level of effrontery to shoving yourself into the Presidental nomination without having a clear ostensible record for the American people to judge you on? One has to wonder why Barack Obama hungered to do all of this so quickly? One has to wonder if the ascendancy of Barack Obama to this level without much experience or record speaks to a dangerous cult of personality? One has to wonder if Barack Obama can get away with too much as President with such a dangerous cult of personality and an irresponsible subservient swooning media?

One of my best friends articulated this very well as he was fluxuating on who he will support in 2008:

"I must be at peace with my conscience. I am no longer a supporter of B. H… well you know the rest. My heart is full of regret for abandoning my beloved H. Clinton and falling victim to the empty promise that is Obama. Mr. Obambi has recently shown his true colors and demonstrated that he is no super hero, but simply a heartless and dispassionate politician. Obama’s thirst for power and popularity is unrivaled and frankly it scares me. Obama has acquired international fame and recognition and I fear that his first priority is no longer the interests of the American people..."

First and foremost however, we are in a center-right country that tends to average out to having center-right values, whether they be economic, foreign, social, etc. The fact of the matter is that Barack Obama is on the left. Perhaps, but questionably, not on the hard-left, but consistently left. Whether it's "spreading the wealth around", talking to rogue states without preconditions, relentless support for unfettered abortion rights, reasonable hostility towards free trade, massive union support including open voting, excessive support from labor unions, affirmative action support, anti-voucher or anti-significant European style competition overhaul of the education system (in favor of throwing more money at the problem), being strongly against gun rights, too much government intervention in healthcare programs, spending proposals ($1T in new spending), getting a grade of "F" by the National Taxpayers' Union, a poor grade by the "Citizens Against Government Waste" group, or a lack of commitment to immigration reform, his record is decisively left and arguably out of the mainstream. With the aforementioned record, policy proposals, and endorsements I find it probable that Barack Obama will certainly move towards the "implimentation" of policies outside the American mainstream, and with the trifecta of House and Senate control, there's a horribly large possibility that this unholy setup without checks and balances can lead to severe pushes of agenda outside the mainstream. Most Americans don't want this, and these policies don't align with mainstream values.

While I don't think Senator Obama shares deep sympathies with any of his controversial associations, I fault him heavily for deceiving the American people by throwing these associations under the bus when it was politically convenient to do so. Obama flat out lied to the American people when he denied launching his state senate career in domestic terrorist Bill Ayers living room. He has lied to the American people when he claimed that he did not know that his pastor of 20 years, Jeremiah Wright, was an anti-American and anti-white zealot who said that the government gave black people AIDS as a way to kill them off. He presumably has lied to the American people about his Aunt Zeituni's illegal immigration status (or for writing about her so much in his books, he sure is a sucky nephew). He's dishonestly downplayed his associations with Farrakhan and Tony Resko. He admitted to flirting with Marxist ideology and doing drugs in college, certainly not becoming for America's commander-in-chief. In summary, I think Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton said it best:

"The presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the-job training."
-Joe Biden

"Senator McCain will bring a lifetime of experience to the campaign, and Senator Obama will bring a speech he gave in 2002"
-Hillary Clinton

In contrast, recognizing that Senator John McCain is a significant and intelligent departure from President Bush, who Senator Obama shamefully and wrongfully puppets as a would be extension of Senator McCain, I very strongly endorse Senator McCain as President for 2008.

Senator McCain has an extraordinary record of leadership dating back to his days as a naval war hero who refused to abandon his men in his Vietnamese POW camp and extending to his present triumphs of extraordinary bipartisanship and running an underdog campaign in a toxic Republican climate.

Senator McCain has had an extraordinary amount of experience dating from his naval service over 40 years ago to his many years in the US Senate.

In an era of excessive partisanship, Senator McCain has been proven to be far more bipartisan and less divisive than Senator Obama, dating back to McCain-Feingold and calling religious-right leaders "agents of intolerance".

Senator McCain is as committed to combating climate change and dedicated to environmental issues as Senator Obama, and coupled with Governor Palin's extraordinary experience with energy issues, the McCain/Palin ticket is as formidable a ticket as the Democrats in leading America towards energy independence.

Senator McCain is one of the most experienced and respected leaders in America in terms of foreign issues and foreign policy. While the Democrats and Senator Obama would have sent Iraq into a cascading quagmire, Senator McCain demanded a troop surge as put forth by General Petraeus, which has now preserved and vindicated all the effort, blood, money, and tears Americans have put into Iraq. Iraq is now seeing its lowest levels of violence since combat began and the combined 53 million people in Iraq and Afghanistan now have a chance at a stable democracy instead of the excessive tyranny they lived with under Saddam Hussein and the Taliban.

Last, but most importantly, I'd like to discuss with you why Senator John McCain is the only choice for President in these troubling economic times.

Let's start with this idea of extra taxation, which in this case includes Senator Obama's proposed raising of the dividends tax, capital gains tax, corporate tax rate, and taxes on those that make over $250,000 (although that is changing day by day). When you are in an downturn slash economic environment in which people are not willing to take risks to further stimulate the economy, you have to incentivize people to take risks in a glum economy, and that includes tax cuts and not tax raises. All of these groups in which Senator Obama seeks to tax are the groups which have the potential capital to build, restimulate, and grow the economy, and create jobs.

It's NOT ABOUT RICH VS. POOR, it's about common sense and growth. It's no secret that when Reagan cut the upper class tax rate from 70% to 28%, revenue to the government doubled. People who are at the upper rungs of the economy need to be rewarded for their increased ability for entreprenurial output and innovation.

In regards to McCain's plan to lower corporate taxes, take note that our corporate taxes are the second highest in the world. During a potential recession, why would you scare international or internal investment in the US away from creating businesses and jobs in America? Why develop a business in the US, taxed to high hell, when you can open up shop in Ireland for 1/3 the tax rate? It's not simply about oil and other corporate fat cats. It's not about class warfare. Lots of businesses are struggling and if you make hostile business climate taxation policies, businesses don't grow and leave US shores, setting up in more business friendly economies, and our economy tanks. In our potential recession, we need to keep businesses in the US and lure more businesses here, and we can do that by lowering corporate taxes.

We've lived too long with a government that is not a good steward of our taxpayer dollars. John McCain, unlike President Bush, has vowed to streamline government programs and take out the veto pen to cut down drastically on wasteful congressional pork-barrel projects.

Here are some comments I've made recently about John McCain's general mantra to grow the economy:

"There's so much waste in the government. Republicans aren't about cutting programs like healthcare and medicare. We are about streamlining them, making them less bureaucratic, finding waste and cutting it, and operating government organizations more efficiently like a business. While Bush hasn't been responsible about cutting pork-barrel, McCain and most Republicans will be. Democrats will not allow that because they have to bend over to union interests and have no concern for spending Americans' hard earned money. No one in America should have to pay one cent more of taxes for an inefficent government that IS NOT RESPONSIVE TO THEM or RESPONSIBLE STEWARDS OF THEIR TAX DOLLARS!"

"Unfortunately, it's not just as easy as tax those above $250,000, not to mention Barack raises taxes on everybody with the doubling of the capital gains tax. 110,000 small businesses in America make revenue about $250,000, and raising taxes on them stifles growth and hurts their bottom line. In addition, citizens who make over $250,000 are generally more intelligent, innovative people who will cycle money back into the US market either through creating more businesses or buying products. They fuel the economy and create growth, innovation, and jobs - in a potential recession, it's better they have the money and not the inefficient federal government where a bunch of incompetent bureaucrats decide what to do with it."

"I know being poor in America sucks, but I am of the opinion that wealth is created for everyone in a very free market (semi-regulated to the point of enforcing contracts, external factors, and exchange of information) that heavily rewards innovation, growth, and risk-taking. The US took off because people were allowed to do that en-masse, and other countries with heavier redistribution paradigms are far more stagnant. In other words, we can live in a society where we have a gap between the rich and the poor or we have a tiny gap between the less poor and poorer. There are optimum tax rates for generating overall wealth, rewarding risk taking and innovation, and creating economic balance and fairness, with the acknowledgement that life just can't be fair and equal for everyone, but it can be reasonably decent for all. I believe tax rates are too high, and unreasonable when we have a government that wastes 40 cents of every dollar with bureaucratic negligence and inefficient waste. It's not just programs, although lots of those are ridiculous. It's about the need for streamlining."

McCain's healthcare plan will insure 21 million more people in America, versus Obama's 26 million. However, McCain's healthcare plan is far more efficient because it doesn't involve federalizing more healthcare and new federalized programs in America. This is not the time for larger government.


I'd also like to address Governor Sarah Palin's VP Candidacy. Sarah Palin is the only candidate on either ticket to have executive experience, which includes running the largest state by land size as well as a $40 Billion Dollar economy. It is unfair to judge her entire future on a couple of bad interviews only days after she arrived on the national scene. If you look back to her debates for the Alaska governorship you'll see her performance is tremendous when versed on the issues. Look at her progress from those interviews to the Vice Presidential Debates. Look at her performance as the most popular governor in America. Think how far she'll go when she arrives as VP at the White House. Think how amazing she'll be once she's sat in on foreign policy and staff meetings on all the issues. Sarah Palin no doubt has a reformer's heart and an incredible intelligence that some people refuse to see because folks like Keith Olbermann diminish her because they're scared of her and they patronize people who don't talk like they just came back from an elite Washington cocktail party.

People - I understand we desperately need change! I promise from the bottom of my heart that John McCain will offer the change you are looking for and represent you with the utmost honesty and integrity with which he has served this country for nearly half-a-century.

Please, vote for John McCain on Tuesday. From California to Maine. From men to women. From rich to poor. From straight to gay. My friends, I love you all and I feel strongly about this.

______________________________________________
Obama's Redistribution of Wealth Discussion Back in 2001:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck

Obama's Record on Voting 96% of the Time with his Party/Biography:
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/o000167/

Key Votes:
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/o000167/key-votes/

Project Vote Smart - Obama on the Issues:
http://www.votesmart.org/npat.php?can_id=9490

Interest Group Support:
http://www.votesmart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=9490

Quick State by State Electoral Update (Current as of 7P Nov.1.08)

by Justin La Grange

As we know by now, it is not the national polls that matter (although they are important trend indicators), but state polls that determine the outcome of the electoral college. Obama could be registering 60% to 40% nationally (theoretically), but if he's getting 100% support in California, Washington, New York, Massachusetts, etc, it is still hypothetically possible to lose the electoral college (just an illustrative example that national polls aren't necessarily king).

Funny things are starting to happen. States that McCain should have absolutely solidified like North Dakota, Arizona, Georgia, and Arizona are becoming bonafide swing states with Obama trailing by exactly 3-4% in all of these states. But states that McCain was trailing in recently that he needed to solidify have been tightening, like Pennsylvania, Ohio, and North Carolina. Indiana and Missouri have actually switched back into McCain's column.

With all these polls, keep the following in mind:

In 2004, President Bush was trailing 13-17 points behind John Kerry in Pennsylvania right before the election. President Bush lost Pennsylvania by roughly 2 points. Today, John McCain trails by only 7.5% in Pennsylvania, after being behind about 10-12% early last week. Remember that Obama was also ahead in the Pennsylvania primary polls, and absolutely tanked in the primary outcome.

John McCain is the "safe candidate", especially in backwater states in places like Western Pennsylvania. And 1 in 7 voters are still undecided. This is the reason why John McCain's attacks on Ayers and "socialism", and GOP PAC's attacks on Resko, Wright, and Khalidi are not totally in vain. They solidify doubts in undecided voters who will view John McCain as the safe candidate: the white naval hero who has the bipartisan record. To illustrate, it was reported in Texas that 23% still incorrectly thought that Obama is Muslim. While I don't think that's specifically the case with these undecided voters, people will often vote for the candidate that they have the least questions and doubts about in the voting booth.

Also, these polling outfits take into account heavy turnout by African-American and youth voters. While African-Americans have been coming out en-masse, the youth vote this year is a little more dubious. Also, these polling outfits have not taken into account increased turnout among Republican voters, which if speaking to any Republican I know has been any kind of anecdotal indication, Republicans and many moderates will be out full force mobilized against Obama.

I've been looking at these polls, and a lot of them just don't seem right. For instance, California is a state far more prone to success for McCain than Bush, and yet the numbers are showing 57%-33% in favor of Obama. While it's true California is not that heavily polled, I can promise you that those numbers are inaccurate, especially when Bush has lost California in numbers like 57-43 and 55-45. If California is absolutely incorrect from an outfit like RCP/Yahoo Political dashboard, what does it say about the other polls in undoubtedly the most accurate polling outfit which averages all the other major polls.

And as a verbatim mention from my other note:
http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=33243837333&id=1219649&index=0

Possible Reasons for Polling Error:

Voters who are more enthusiastic about their candidate tend to respond to pollsters. More often than not, that candidate would be Barack Obama, perhaps making him overrepresented in the sample.

The Bradley Effect: People don't want to tell the pollster they're voting McCain or they put themselves in the undecided category for fear of seeming racist. This intimidation effect seems plausible, as I don't feel terribly comfortable going around Berkeley toting my McCain/Palin pin (but I do), but will be very comfortable toting McCain/Palin in the ballot box.

Safe Candidate Syndrome: People are not afraid to go with the more controversial and less safe choice (if their a moderate swing voter) when chatting with a pollster or doing some online survey. However, there's a certain finality and seriousness of the ballot box that makes people re-examine their concerns and fears and vote with the "safe" candidate

The Numbers
Taking into account how grossly wrong all these polls could be from the factors I've listed above, look at the current swing state percentages from RCP/Yahoo Political Dashboard, keeping in mind McCain can afford to lose a couple of these states:

Missouri: 48.3%/47.7% (McCain/Obama)

Indiana: 47.3%/46.8% (McCain/Obama)

North Carolina: 48.3%/47.0% (Obama/McCain)

Florida: 49.8%/45.7% (Obama/McCain)

Ohio: 49.2%/43.6% (Obama/McCain)

Virginia: 51.0%/45.0% (Obama/McCain)

Pennsylvania: 51.2%/43.7% (Obama/McCain)

Nevada: 50.5%/44.0% (Obama/McCain)

Colorado: 51.5%/45.3% (Obama/McCain)

New Mexico: 50.3%/43.0% (Obama/McCain)

Keep in mind the margins in these states are all below 7.5%.

While I definitely don't think McCain has an equal shot at winning, and he's certainly on the defensive with an uphill battle, I'm here to say that for anybody that thinks Obama definitely has this in the bag might just be a little too hasty. McCain has a chance here, and if he had no shot, Vegas wouldn't be riding 84-16 on Obama. They'd be riding 99-1. McCain has always been the underdog, and he's always come back from behind. They declared him dead in the primaries, and here he is today running strong against a major Democratic tide. Never count out John McCain.

Friday, October 24, 2008

McCain Tightening Up The Race and Positioning His Path to Victory

by Justin La Grange


I will write an endorsement note soon; not that it will be any surprise, but I just wanted to articulate why I'm endorsing who I am endorsing so I'm not further accused of being any of the following:
a. racist
b. stupid
c. devoid of hope
d. all of the above

At this point, October 22, Obama leads by slight margins in a lot of key states that McCain needs to pick up, according to RCP/Yahoo Political Dashboard (where you can find all this data). These are Florida, Missouri, Ohio, and North Carolina. And when I say slight margins, I really mean slight margins like 1-3% in all of these, within the margin of error. With two weeks to go, McCain gaining momentum, and growing worries of the Bradley Effect and polling error taking place in mid to high single digits on final poll outcomes, it is now looking likely that those states could easily and likely go to John McCain. When you have margins like this, I anticipate that these states, driven by the propensity of the undecideds to swing to the non-controversial candidate, will go to the "safe" John McCain.

Current Polling In FL, NC, MO, and OH:
Florida (27EV): Obama 48%/McCain 46.5%
North Carolina (15EV): Obama 49.2%/McCain 47.2%
Missouri (11EV): Obama 48%/McCain 45.3%
Ohio (20EV): Obama 48.3%/McCain 45.8%

Okay, that assumption tallies to 247 electoral votes for McCain and 291 votes for Obama. McCain still needs 22-23 electoral votes from somewhere. Below are some of the options.



Nevada (5 Electoral Votes)

Obama is leading McCain 49.3% to 46% in Nevada, which factoring in statistical error could make Nevada even. I don't think McCain is trending as well in the west as he is in the East Coast states I've listed above which is why I haven't given it to him as I have FL, NC, OH, and MO. However, when the polls start tightening up near the end of the race and given the factors I've listed for tightening above, I think McCain is in a very comfortable position to possibly win Nevada.

Pennsylvania (21 Electoral votes)

McCain is still campaigning very hard in Pennsylvania despite high single digit to low double digit trailing in the polls. You would think that this seems very odd as McCain has near abandoned states like Michigan and Iowa where he trails by a similar margin. Interestingly enough, Pennsylvania is a major anomaly, with pollsters and campaigns on both sides admitting that the margin in their internal polling is significantly tighter than national polling. In addition, Pennsylvania has a history of dramatic poll shifts in the final days, and the final results tend to favor Republican candidates heavily, albeit the polls had the Democrats at twenty point leads in those races (for example; so they ended up winning by narrow margins). Obama was absolutely trounced in Pennsylvania primaries by Hillary Clinton, likely by more socially conservative Democrats who saw right through his covering up of those Chicago and San Francisco liberal values. In that trouncing, Clinton saw a larger margin of victory than the polls had been predicting.

Pennsylvania is a state that stretches into the midwest and has a very large contingency of Republicans in Western Pennsylvania as well as socially moderate/generally moderate suburban voters all over Pennsylvania - exactly the kind of voter that caters to McCain (less so than President Bush, who lost the state by a very narrow margin). Rep. John Murtha also called Western Pennsylvania "very racist", which can only work the "Bradley Effect" in McCain's favor.


New Hampshire (4 Electoral Votes)

New Hampshire is a very libertarian state, and McCain had a large fan base there dating back from 2000 in which he called religious leaders backing George W. Bush "agents of intolerance". Despite a roughly 9% trail in the polls (52-BO/43-JMC), this is a state that was tied for McCain just a few weeks ago and could easily tie again with national shifts trending towards McCain. Keep in mind that New Hampshire is not a bonafide East Coast liberal state, much like Pennsylvania. Incidentally, McCain has been campaigning quite amply in New Hampshire as of late.

Virginia (13 Electoral Votes)

McCain is trailing by 7 points (51.5-BO/44.5-JMC). Again, national swings and polling error can put this state further into play. Virginia is also a traditionally Republican state, although it does have lots of blacks coming in full force for Obama as well as a lot of folks moving from DC into Northern Virginia. However, the 2004 election underrepresented Bush's actual support by a decent margin in the polls, meaning that it's possible such a thing could happen here.

Colorado (9 Electoral Votes)

Obama is currently leading McCain 50.4% to 45% in this traditionally Republican state. Again, national swings and polling error can put Colorado into play come November 4th. Somehow, I'm not terribly bullish on Colorado, but if McCain can continue to tighten it up a little, it may be possible to pull off a win.

Getting to 270

Making the assumption that McCain pulls off the aforementioned 247 EV's in OH, FL, MO, and NC, let's assemble some likely scenarios to 270.
247 + 21 PA + 1 in Maine = 269 tie
247 + 21 PA + 4 NH = 272 win
247 + 21 PA + 5 NV = 273 win
247 + 21 PA + 9 CO = 277 win
247 + 13 VA + 9 CO = 269 tie
247 + 13 VA + 21PA = 281 win
247 + 13 VA + 5 NV + 9 CO = 274 win
247 + 13 VA + 5 NV + 4 NH = 269 tie

As you can see, the road to the White House for John McCain lies in winning either Pennsylvania or Virginia, and then peeling off a small bit of something else to tip it over.



Reasons for Polling Error:

Voters who are more enthusiastic about their candidate tend to respond to pollsters. More often than not, that candidate would be Barack Obama, perhaps making him overrepresented in the sample.

The Bradley Effect: People don't want to tell the pollster they're voting McCain or they put themselves in the undecided category for fear of seeming racist. This intimidation effect seems plausible, as I don't feel terribly comfortable going around Berkeley toting my McCain/Palin pin (but I do), but will be very comfortable toting McCain/Palin in the ballot box.

Safe Candidate Syndrome: People are not afraid to go with the more controversial and less safe choice (if their a moderate swing voter) when chatting with a pollster or doing some online survey. However, there's a certain finality and seriousness of the ballot box that makes people re-examine their concerns and fears and vote with the "safe" candidate

References:

WSJ: Are the polls accurate?:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122463210033356561.html?mod=djemEditorialPage

News Outlets Sweat Over Exit Poll Accuracy:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20081021/pl_politico/14778

BBC: Will Closet Racism Derail Obama:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/us_elections_2008/7675551.stm

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Is UC Berkeley Subverting State Law? It Sure Looks Like It


UC Berkeley has made no secret of its desire to eliminate Proposition 209, which was passed in 1996 to eliminate discrimination against certain races in the California public university admissions process. Specifically, Prop 209 made it illegal to continue the practice of giving applications with "minority" designations preference and a boost up in the admissions process despite having inferior "numerical" (GPA and SAT) qualifications. You could tell the process of discrimination was rampant before Prop 209 because minority enrollment plunged and their numerical data points surged upward, as evidenced by the data in the links I have provided.

The question in front of us now is whether UC Berkeley has disobeyed state law as mandated by the people of California by subverting the non-racial application review process in its admissions office. The evidence is quite overwhelming to support this.

Here's a pretty non-shocking yet explosive allegation made by an admissions committee member at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), who claims in his report that UCLA has covered up the fact that it takes race into account in its admissions process through this really dodgy process called "holistic" application review, or basically the notion that the application reader's touchy feely opinion of the student is king. The major charge is that application readers look at the application more favorably if there is a mention of race, and that is not likely preferable as a applicant if your father is a diplomat from Hong Kong and your major hardship was getting a lesser BMW than you wanted for your sweet 16. The report also charges that UC Berkeley uses similar admissions review processes and is more touchy feely; therefore is also quite likely to be subverting state law.


Now here is the primary beef at UC Berkeley. Look at the admissions data by SAT Score for applicants who were admitted and decided to come to Berkeley. The margin between the median SAT Score by race from Black/Hispanic and White/Asian is enormous. Furthermore, the margin between Chinese and everyone else is even more enormous. This data is unfortunately pre-2006, but it still says a whole lot about what's been going on these last few years. From what I've heard, the present data trends are similar.

Year 2005 Median SAT Scores For Freshman Registrants: 135
• American Indian: 1335
• White: 1360
• Asian American Average: 1380
• International: 1430
• Chinese & Korean: 1410
• East Indian: 1410
• Filipino/Pacific Islander: 1290/1300
• African American: 1080
• Hispanic: 1140
Look at that enormous discrepancy! What factor specifically caused the average admitted and enrolled Hispanic and African-American groups to get in despite scoring an average of about 200-300 points below the major White and Asian peer groups? What elements were so spectacular in their applications that made up for the obvious deficiency in test scores? Did these groups have an abundance of extra curricular or leadership attributes that the average Asian or White did not have? It certainly can't be GPA, as the school's provided tables show a lower average GPA for these groups as well. Maybe it is just me, but I'm going to say that, in the words of David Letterman, "something doesn't smell right."
This is a civil rights issue. This is a government entity discriminating against its citizens. This is a whole group of people in that 200-300 point SAT margin that did not get into Berkeley. Citizens have a right to an investigation of UC Berkeley's admissions office for these potentially high crimes.

More Links on the Issue

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Really Hilarious McCain Quotes = I Heart John McCain

"Do you know why Chelsea Clinton is so ugly? Because Janet Reno is her father." --at a 1998 Republican fundraiser
"Washington is a Hollywood for ugly people. Hollywood is a Washington for the simpleminded."
"You know, the French remind me a little bit of an aging actress of the 1940s who is still trying to dine out on her looks but doesn't have the face for it."
"I said, 'The nice thing about Alzheimer's is you get to hide your own Easter eggs.'"
"At least I don't plaster on the makeup like a trollop, you cunt." -to his wife, Cindy, after she playfully twirled his hair and said "You're getting a little thin up there,"
"You know the difference between a lawyer and a catfish? One is a scum-sucking bottom-dweller. The other is a fish."
"My Social Security number is 8." --joking with Jay Leno
"You know, by a strange coincidence I was not elected Miss Congeniality in the United States Senate this year." --after being asked by Rev. Rick Warren about going against his party
"The good news is that we now have enough money to run the entire campaign in Colorado. The bad news is, some of that money is still in your wallets and purses." --speaking at a fundraiser in Aspen, Colorado
"Fuck you! I know more about this than anyone else in the room." --to Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), during a testy exchange about immigration legislation
"I had something picked out for you, too - a little IED (improvised explosive device) to put on your desk." --to Jon Stewart
"In case you missed it, a few days ago Senator Clinton tried to spend $1 million on the Woodstock Concert Museum. Now, ladies and gentlemen, I wasn't there. I'm sure it was a cultural and pharmaceutical event. I was tied up at the time." --on the years he spent as a P.O.W. in Vietnam
"Thanks for the question, you little jerk." -- John McCain, after being asked by a high school student if he was too old to be president. For good measure, McCain then threatened to draft him.
"Remember the words of Chairman Mao: 'It's always darkest before it's totally black.'"
"Presidential ambition is a disease that can only be cured by embalming fluid."
"I'm older than dirt, I've got more scars than Frankenstein, but I've learned a few things along the way."
"Never get into a wrestling match with a pig. You both get dirty, and the pig likes it." --to reporters in New Hampshire after being asked him about Mitt Romney
"We spent $3 million to study the DNA of bears in Montana. I don't know if that was a paternity issue or a criminal issue." --on wasteful congressional spending
"I spent several years in a North Vietnamese prison camp, in the dark, fed with scraps. Do you think I want to do that all over again as vice president of the United States?"
"We have a lot of work to do. It's a very hard struggle, particularly given the situation on the Iraq-Pakistan border." --referring to a border that does not exist, ABC News interview, July 21, 2008
"I am learning to get online myself, and I will have that down fairly soon, getting on myself. I don't expect to be a great communicator, I don't expect to set up my own blog, but I am becoming computer literate to the point where I can get the information that I need." --New York Times interview, July 13, 2008
"Maybe that's a way of killing them." --responding to a report that $158 million in cigarettes have been shipped to Iran during Bush's presidency despite restrictions on U.S. exports to that country, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, July 8, 2008
"I will veto every single beer, um, bill with earmarks." --speaking at the National Small Business Summit, Washington, D.C., June 10, 2008 (Watch video clip)
"Well, basically, it's a Google." --on how he's conducting his VP search, Richmond, Virginia, June 9, 2008
"We should be able to deliver bottled hot water to dehydrated babies." --Kenner, Louisiana, June 3, 2008
"You know that old Beach Boys song, Bomb Iran? Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran." --breaking into song after being asked at a VFW meeting about whether it was time to send a message to Iran, Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, April 18, 2007 (Watch video clip)
"I will conduct a respectful debate. Now, it will be dispirited -- it will be spirited -- because there are stark differences. I am a proud conservative, liberal Republica-- conservative Republican...Hello? Easy there."
"I am a illiterate that has to rely on my wife for all of the assistance I can get." -after being asked whether us uses a Mac or a PC.
"It's not social issues I care about."
"No, I'm calling you a fucking jerk." --to fellow Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley, when Grassley asked "Are you calling me stupid?"
"Only an asshole would put together a budget like this ... I wouldn't call you an asshole unless you really were an asshole." --to Budget Committee Chairman and fellow Repulican Sen. Pete Domenici, during a Senate budget hearing


SOURCE: http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/johnmccain/a/mccain-quotes.htm

Complied by Daniel Kurtzman

Interesting Electoral College Scenarios


Here is today's electoral college map, making the assumption that all swing states go to the person currently leading, no matter the margin. According to this, Barack Obama wins the election 273-265. In order for this to happen, McCain will win Ohio, Virginia, Florida, and Nevada - he doesn't have comfortable margins in either Nevada, Virginia, or Ohio. However, this assumes Obama will retain his very uncomfortable leads in Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Colorado, and Minnesota (all under 3%). Keep in mind that McCain is likely to keep Florida, Ohio, Virginia, and Nevada, meaning he needs to turn over only one other swing state to win (with the exception of New Hampshire). Pennsylvania, Colorado, or another dark horse state could easily go McCain's way.


According to recently released data, Obama could lose roughly 6 percentage points on election day because he is black. In other words, when the pollsters call folks, they feel comfortable being "progressive" because it is not their real vote. However, when they actually get in the voting booth and have to make that critical decision, they will vote for the safe candidate, which is John McCain. Anyway, assuming Obama loses 6 percentage point in each state, above is the resulting electoral victory for McCain - an absolute sweep (this is also assuming McCain gains no points and being very generous towards Obama - just dropping Obama's percentage 6% and keeping McCain's the same, even though that's not really realistic). It's fascinating that Washington currently has Obama leading McCain 49-45, which is an extremely small margin for a state like Washington. Consider New Mexico, a reasonably red state, having Obama leading 50-44. It is unfathomable that Washington is a narrower swing state. Also consider solidly Blue Minnesota, the only state to have not voted for Ronald Reagan, having a 47-45 lead for Obama - that's only 2%, also unfathomable. The point is that if polling behavior is really slightly different from voting behavior, it's going to be a very tough race for Obama.


What if everything is near the current status quo come election day, except McCain wins New Hampshire, in which he is only trailing by a little over a percentage point? That would give both candidates 269 electoral votes. In that case, the House would cast their vote for Obama (for President, the constitutional responsibility of the House), and the Senate would cast a tie for the VP vote since Lieberman (no longer a Democrat), would cast his vote for Sarah Palin. This 50-50 tie would then go to Vice President Cheney, who would most certainly vote for Sarah Palin. Boy, the Democrats were stupid for crossing Joe Lieberman. He's already spoken at the RNC, and now he might swing a VP election to Sarah Palin, with president Barack Hussein Obama! It's called karma Democrats - karma for swinging so far to the left that you oust absolutely respectable, honorable, and moderate Joe Lieberman. Horrible!

What The Fa MotherFa? Why Be A Republican With These Positions?


Recently I was verbally assaulted by a fellow Facebooker for some of my posted items and notes being "propaganda" and furthermore called a "chickenhawk". It's true that I have made no secret of my preference for John McCain in this election, but that still does not qualify this guy calling me a "chickenhawk". Instead of being a pussy and whining about it, I got us into an extensive message battle in which I explained why I should not be called a chickenhawk, and I stated some positions that are regarded as centrist to liberal. He then retorted, "Why on earth are you voting for John McCain?" I realized at that point that I had been asked that a lot, so I'm going to clarify exactly what I believe and how that likely correlates into a center-right preference. In summary, I'm pretty libertarian, i.e. conservative on economic/military issues and liberal on social issues. So why vote for the GOP? Because first and foremost I view economic issues and the limited role of government as king, and social issues are just philosophical formations to which I subscribe but have no use for. If you ask me whether I'm more likely to be overtaxed or have a gay marriage, I'd say hopefully overtaxed (yes Carlos, I can anticipate your retort already). If David Beckham offered me a gay marriage and half of his estate, you would see me swiftly move to the Democratic Party. And a year later, you would see me get a swift gay divorce and be swimming amongst Ferraris and Heidi Fleiss's whores.

_______________________________________
Here are some excerpts from my message regarding my political philosophy:

"Needless to say, I'm a tad bit disappointed. I take great enjoyment in my political writing, satire, and being provocative and inflammatory. Most of my FB friends (whom I know nearly all in person) know that."

"I'm sorry you disagree with my viewpoints. Most of my friends do, yet I have fun in a political back and forth jabbing and also enjoy substantive dialogue on the issues. We "jab back and forth" all the time (yes, via Facebook), reminding each other of our other candidates' triumphs and falldowns. It's a sport and a game - not that politics is a sport - it's a real sad affair actually - but one that is so sad that it needs to be livened up and "sportinized" in order to survive it. If I had conservative friends (Berkeley - hello?), my notes would be no fun and unprovocative."

"When other people incessantly post stuff about McCain being old, Bush being a retard, and Obama soaring in the polls, I take a friendly jab and then respect them for their viewpoints, because apparently with the exception of me everyone else is entitled to them."

"Despite my hope for a quick withdrawal, preference for gay marriage/LGBT rights, pro-choice position, hope for more public transportation infrastructure, progressive support for a female VP, alternative energy/environmental protection, stem cell research, moderate gun control position, support of vouchers to allow the less unfortunate and minorities to get a better education..."

"...but don't let any of that get in the way of calling me a chickenhawk."

____________________________________
I then clarified my positions (excerpt):

Because first and foremost I value economic freedom and freedom from a large oppressive government that overtaxes its citizens and then wastes their money with no accountability. No matter how rich or poor anyone is, they should not be unfairly taxed. I passionately believe in that. While that won't change much with McCain, and the Republicans have been terribly tax & spend as well, I cannot accept the Democratic party (especially Obama's) rhetoric and action on the issue.

I believe in every citizen earning their way in a market economy, and believe that redistribution harms people on the lower economic rungs by creating dependency and never giving incentive for people of lower economic status to move out of that class. I believe in Clinton's (wildly unpopular with Democrats) Welfare Reform Act.

You of course are familiar with how unions have brought down the airline industry (and other industry). Unions have outgrown their use, and whichever party has them in their back pocket is the party I cannot accept.

School choice - I sincerely want our schools improved - especially for the lowest tiers of society - and guess which party is in bed with public school teachers' unions, hijacking everybody's right to a good education. [If you allot $8000 dollars to each student/parent instead of investing the money solely in the school to which their child would normally subscribe, the student/parent can choose whether the school he goes to is good enough - if it's not, private institutions will be clamoring to take that $8000 to give a superior education. Then in order to survive, the public school will up their game if they have to compete against private institutions for the student].
I love immigrants and immigration, but we can't continue to be a country that can't properly account for who is in it [and the resulting balance of resources]. Whichever party at least has more rhetoric towards closing the borders is my party. McCain had a reasonable proposal on this about a year or so back.

Iraq is a mess/stupid idea, but there's no denying that the surge, which McCain supported and Barack didn't, was the right thing to do in stabilizing Iraq and will allow us to pull out AND have a relative amount of success in securing the country.

McCain = better than Bush on environment [went across party lines and co-sponsored bills promoting the environment and fighting global warming]

McCain = female VP, open to pro-choice VP

Whichever party/candidate is the best on those issues is first and foremost the one I will lean towards. I'm not rich - I just believe in smaller government - the power of the individual [and freedom from government oppression].

It's also a function of where I grew up and how I developed my thinking, but I'm sincere and passionate about a conservative libertarian ideology - I'm not evil, I'm not a religious fanatic, I don't hate gays...I just have ideas about the fundamental nature of government.

______________________________________________
Some More Issues Discussion (Liberal Positions):

I am pro-choice. However, I have a strong pro-life ethos and I loathe how too many left-leaning people are too quick to dismiss excellent arguments from pro-life groups. I did write a blogpost about the abortion issue, in which I fundamentally concluded that ending the right to an abortion would first and foremost be dangerous to women who really want/need an abortion and take illegitimate back door procedures to get one and the logistical nightmare of the government/taxpayer supporting 40 million unwanted babies that would have been born since the 1970's and more than likely be a drain on society financially and in terms of resources (prison, welfare, etc). I do however dismiss the notion that an abortion is something that women should be willy-nilly entitled to and I condemn the amount of abortions that have occurred in which lots women have no one to blame but themselves and should be deserving of no sympathy for murdering their child.

I believe in background checks for guns. Not every idiot, especially one with a hint of a criminal record, should be allowed to purchase a gun. However, law-abiding Americans have the right to own a gun for protection or whatever they see fit. As an American, you should be able to own or operate whatever you want, but when you infringe on the life or property of another American, you should be punished to the full extent of the law.

I believe in states rights to decide gay marriage, at minimum. It's been a long road to this conclusion, and I've come to believe that gays in a legitimate relationship should not be barred from having the same legal and ceremonial rights that straight Americans have come to enjoy. When you bring marriage into the "state", marriage is no longer the property of religious groups - it is the property of all people and therefore no citizen should be denied access to it. However I am not a fan of a large sector of gay separatism, and that is gays being hostile to Americans who happen to have more traditional values just for the sake of history and tit-for-tat. If gays want gay marriage to be an accepted concept in America, they need to separate themselves (no pun intended) from a separatist culture that usually includes severe indoctrination in leftist ideology. Be the better man (or queen), and accept their right to their opinion just as you should be allowed to have yours.

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Travel Stats Review: End of an Era


Effective 12:00AM Eastern Standard Time on August 21, 2008, my 23 year tenure as a non-revenue (free flight) dependent had come to a close. It's extremely sad to me that I can no longer have the world at my fingertips with the click of a button, and I feel really small and confined in California against the backdrop of a world that has become quite huge again.

The good news is that I've gone to so many places, seen so many great things, and met so many cool people along the way. I've been asked if by a few people if I'd ever documented my travels or compiled any stats. As a tribute to my illustrious "career", I thought I'd put those stats into a note, both for my own self interest and those who might care. Also, a few interesting "what Delta was a few years ago" flights.

As a background, my mom worked for Pan Am from 1966 to 1991, and Delta from 1991 to Present. Children of airline employees at all levels are entitled to travel benefits, and in Delta's case, absolutely free domestic & international travel in the most premium cabin available. This standby travel, or getting space in the highest cabin or even on the plane, is ordered by active/retiree/affiliate and seniority.

Anyway, here we go:

I've been to:
• 29 countries (thanks Vatican City!)
• All six inhabited continents
• 27 US States

I've Cleared US Customs through 7 gateways in order of frequency:
• Atlanta (Asia, Europe, Middle East, South America)
• New York (Europe)
• Los Angeles (Asia, Central America, Europe)
• Miami (Central America, South America)
• Cincinnati (Europe)
• Honolulu (Australia)
• Salt Lake City (Mexico)

International Connections:
• Cleared a connecting flight from Cairo in CDG (Paris), a connecting flight to Athens in FCO (Rome), a connecting flight from Dublin to New York in SNN (Shannon), and connecting flights to/from Singapore in NRT (Tokyo).

US Noteworthy/Major Cities I've Been To:
• Anchorage, Atlanta, Baltimore, Boston, Charleston, Cincinnati, Columbia, Dallas, Denver, Des Moines, Fort Lauderdale, Hartford, Honolulu, Ithaca, Kahului, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, Minneapolis, New Orleans, New York, Newark, Orlando, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Portland, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, Savannah, Seattle, Salt Lake City, Tallahassee, Trenton, Washington DC

Major/Noteworthy International Cities I've Been To (Non-Connecting):
• Amman, Amsterdam, Aqaba, Aruba, Athens, Barcelona, Berlin, Brussels, Buenos Aires, Cairo, Colonia, Cordoba, Dubai, Dublin, Eliat, Guatemala City, Heidelberg, Hong Kong, Istanbul, Jerusalem, London [January 2009], Madrid, Mazatlan, Melbourne, Milan, Montevideo, Nice, Paris, Petra, Rome, Rosario, San Salvador, Santiago de Chile, Sevilla, Singapore, Stuttgart, Sydney, Tangier, Tel Aviv, Tokyo, Vatican City, Venice, Victoria, Vienna


Favorite Cities
• Amsterdam, Barcelona, Boston, Buenos Aires, Charleston, Dubai, Honolulu, Madrid, Melbourne, New York, Paris, Seattle, Sevilla, Singapore, Sydney, Tokyo, Venice

Countries I've Been to More Than Once:
• Argentina, El Salvador, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain

Airlines I've Flown (In Order of Frequency):
• Delta
• Pan Am
• SkyWest, ExpressJet, Comair, ASA\
• Southwest
• American
• United
• Qantas
• Northwest
• Air France
• Alitalia

Top City Pairs (Possibly Via Connecting Gateways):
• Los Angeles-San Francisco
• Los Angeles-Salt Lake City (to get other places)
• Los Angeles-Atlanta
• Los Angeles-New York
• Los Angeles-Honolulu
• San Francisco-Honolulu
• San Francisco-New York
• Los Angeles-Orlando
• Los Angeles-Seattle
• Los Angeles-Oakland
My More Interesting Flights Mostly Outside of Atlanta/New York:
• Los Angeles-Melbourne (QF)
• Los Angeles-Hong Kong (Delta)
• Los Angeles-Guatemala City (Pan Am)
• Melbourne-Sydney (QF)
• Sydney-Honolulu (QF)
• Miami-San Salvador (Pan Am)
• Miami-Buenos Aires (Pan Am)
• Paris-Los Angeles (American)
• Cairo-Paris (Air France)
• Rome-Athens (Alitalia)
• Tokyo-Singapore (Northwest)
• Salt Lake City-Mazatlan (Delta)
• Honolulu-Salt Lake City (Delta)
• Kahului-Atlanta (Delta)
• New York-Nice (Pan Am)
• New York-Istanbul (Pan Am)
• Los Angeles-San Francisco (United 747)

First Flight:
• Los Angeles-New York (Pan Am 747)

Longest International Flight (Tied):
• Dubai-Atlanta (15h:15m)
• Los Angeles-Melbourne (15h:15m)

Longest Domestic Flight:
• Atlanta-Kahului (9h)

International Flights in Coach:
• Aruba-Atlanta
• Tokyo-Atlanta (1 of 2)
• Rome-Athens
• Los Angeles-Melbourne
• Melbourne-Sydney
• Sydney-Honolulu

International Flights in a Premium Class:
• everything not listed above

Domestic Flights I've Flown In a BusinessElite Cabin (long since discontinued):
• New York-Los Angeles (763)
• New York-Salt Lake City (763)
• New York-Cincinnati (763)
• New York-Atlanta (763, 777)
• Atlanta-Los Angeles (763, 777)
• Atlanta-Orlando (777)
• Atlanta-Denver (763)
• Atlanta-Kahului (763)
• Cincinnati-Los Angeles (763)
• Orlando-Los Angeles (M11)

Flights With Startling Capacity Levels (long since discontinued):
• Salt Lake City-Los Angeles (763D)
• Salt Lake City-New York (763D redeye)
• Cincinnati-San Francisco (763D)
• Orlando-Los Angeles (763D, L1011, M11)

Other Tidbits:
• never had a bonafide in-flight emergency
• longest layover in an airport: 17 hours (ATL, 6A to 11P)
• longest continuous sleep: Atlanta-Dubai, 10.5 hours
• longest time overseas: 3 weeks
• shortest time overseas: 19 hours
• farthest point from Los Angeles: Singapore
• states not mentioned in cities: New Mexico, Kentucky, North Carolina
• Planes I've Been on: MD88, MD90, MD11, 727, 732, 733, 738, 747SP, 744, 757, 762, 763, 764, 777, DC10, L1011, A310, A320, A330, CRJ, CR7, CR9, ERJ

And yes, I'm a nerd :)

Dear Democrats: What May I Ask Is Wrong With You?


As Republicans, we weren't initially really worried about this election. We understood that like the economy, politics is a very cyclical thing. We understood that we were primed to lose this election, and Dear Democrats, it was yours to walk away with. May I asked how you fucked up so badly that Grandpa McCain and a sexy librarian from Alaska have a more than 50/50 chance of winning this election?

You had the chance to nominate the glorious Hillary Rodham Clinton, whom I lovingly refer to as H. Clinton. H. Clinton had the backing of the most powerful political force in America: herself and Bill "presidential kneepads" Clinton. This political team had the political experience and wherewithal that the American people trust. Moderate H. Clinton had the backing of working class white men and women all over America - a group that might very well sink this election for Barack in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, etc. Most importantly though, H. Clinton had the "American" wherewithal to win in this election, in that she is not a European-esque far-left secular progressive loon that has been endorsed by moveon.org - this white working class voting bloc of which I speak loathes those kind of people, and the secular-progressive leftist media has not fully done its job in revealing Barack Obama's ties to these groups.


To highlight this, I present Lynn Forester de Rothschild, a Democrat socialite who was strongly supporting H. Clinton. Today, Ms. Rothschild has just come out in full support of John McCain. Some of the reasons Mrs. Rothschild cited were the following:

"I believe that Barack Obama, with MoveOn.org and Nancy Pelosi and Howard Dean, has taken the Democratic Party — and they will continue to — too far to the left. I'm not comfortable there."
"I believe that the McCain-Palin government will be a centrist government," Rothschild said. "It's not going to be an ideological government."
Links:


Also, Hillary Clinton supporter Donald Trump has endorsed John McCain on Larry King Live. Donald Trump is no doubt one of the most savviest business people in America, and with his being a relatively moderate pragmatist, his endorsement carriers a lot of weight.

Mrs. Rothschild and Mr. Trump are doing exactly what moderate, sane Democrats all over America should be doing - standing up to your party's horrible decisions made by the media and the far-left elite! If you do not vote for Barack Obama, and voice your displeasure en masse, you send a direct message to these elements that have hijacked the Democratic party that they cannot do this to you - that they cannot hijack your party! The Democratic Party under JFK and Clinton stood for something: it stood for the people, not Barbra Streisand and moveon.org. You are crucial to the survival of this party, and if they don't have you on board, they lose everything! By abstaining to vote or voting for McCain, who is most bipartisan and best for the country, you create a loss and force the Democratic party to adapt to your needs next time. You hold the power! H. Clinton 2012.